Start from the end: what do you want to have once you're done? A raw data feed you plug into your own system, or a pre-qualified list ready to contact? That is the entire difference between Outscraper and OutSend. Outscraper is a data platform built by and for developers: you connect an API, pull raw data, and build the rest yourself. OutSend is an integrated prospecting pipeline built for European B2B: you start from a geographic area and a business type, and the tool runs the whole chain through to a finished, qualified database.
Neither is "better" in absolute terms. The difference is what you do with the data once it is extracted, and who will be using the tool. This comparison covers Outscraper's real strengths, its factual limitations, where OutSend comes in, then a decision framework and a test protocol to help you choose within a week. Pricing comes from the official pages.
Where Outscraper is solid
Outscraper has been built around three assets that make it a serious, mature tool: the power of its API, its pay-as-you-go billing model with no subscription required, and the breadth of its data source catalog. For a technical team that wants to integrate public data scraping into its own system, these three points carry real weight.
A flexible, well-documented API. Outscraper offers both a no-code dashboard and a full API with single-key authentication and webhook callbacks. The official Outscraper documentation covers each endpoint with its parameters and code examples. You can pipe extractions directly into a CRM, an internal tool, or an orchestrator like Pipedream. For a developer who wants to control everything in code, this is exactly what you need.
A pay-as-you-go model with no commitment. No mandatory monthly subscription. According to the Outscraper pricing page, 2026, you prepay credits that never expire, or you enable post-paid billing by card. The Google Maps scraper is free for the first 500 listings, then $3 per 1,000 results from 501 to 100,000, and $1 per 1,000 beyond that. For occasional or irregular use, this task-based model is straightforward: you only pay for what you consume.
A very wide data catalog and high volumes. Beyond Google Maps, Outscraper aggregates review extraction, emails, phone numbers, and many other sources. Its Outscraper homepage, 2026 claims "Google Maps and 50+ sources," including Amazon, TripAdvisor, Trustpilot, Google Search, the Play Store and more. The Outscraper Maps scraper, 2026 alone returns dozens of fields per business, from name and phone number to opening hours, GPS coordinates, and Google identifiers. For multi-source extraction at very large scale, the tool holds up.
What it leaves you to build yourself
Outscraper delivers data, not a ready-made qualification pipeline built for the French market. Three things are left to you. These are product choices, not flaws.
English interface and support, US-oriented. The company is based in Bee Cave, Texas, and the main interface is in English. For a French team that needs fields adapted to the local context (legal form, RCS registration, INPI data), that layer must be rebuilt from scratch. The addressable market is nonetheless enormous: INSEE counts 5.2 million non-agricultural, non-financial market enterprises (INSEE, 2023), but Outscraper does not offer native legal enrichment against that base.
Costs climb with each additional service activated. The headline price only covers basic Maps listings. Email and contact enrichment is billed separately: according to the Outscraper pricing page, 2026, it is free for the first 500 contacts, then $3 per 1,000 domains from 501 to 100,000. When you stack Maps + emails + additional data at high volume, the final invoice depends on how many services you combine, and it can significantly exceed your initial estimate. The pricing is public: that's how usage-based billing works.
Developer-oriented. The no-code dashboard exists, but getting the most out of it means going through the API: creating an account, generating a key, integrating calls, managing webhooks. For a developer, that is a strength. For a non-technical solo operator or a growth freelancer who has no interest in touching an API key, it's a hurdle. And above all, there is no built-in qualification chain (deliverability checks, URL dead-checks, French legal data) that you can run in one go.
Where OutSend picks up
OutSend does something different. Where Outscraper gives you raw data to integrate yourself, OutSend assembles the complete chain in a single pass: Google Maps scraping, then email lookup, deliverability verification, supplementary phone numbers, social media profiles, dead-check, legal data, and DAG pipelines to chain it all together. Entirely in French, no API setup required.
In practice, if you start from a geographic area and a business type, OutSend builds the list on demand and lets you activate qualification modules right away. You can scrape Google Maps and export to CSV, then verify email deliverability via inbox test, without switching tools or writing a single line of code. SIRET/SIREN/VAT/RCS enrichment is built in natively, because the product is designed for the French business landscape.
For repeated workflows, the no-code prospecting pipeline orchestrates steps as a DAG: scrape → email → deliverability → phone numbers → socials → dead-check → legal data, with no API keys to manage. OutSend is in free alpha, so there is no usage-based billing.
To be clear about where Outscraper remains the better choice. If you are a technical team that wants a raw API, global volumes, and a custom integration into your own pipeline or data warehouse, Outscraper is the right pick. Its API flexibility and international multi-source catalog go beyond OutSend's scope, which is an integrated pipeline built for European B2B. OutSend does the work end-to-end inside its own interface.
Three profiles, three right choices
The right answer depends on who you are and what you want to do with the data. Here is the decision framework in three cases.
Case A: choose Outscraper. You are a developer or you lead a tech team. You want to extract large volumes from multiple international sources and inject the results into your own pipeline via API. You are comfortable with task-based billing as detailed on the official pricing page, and you build your own qualification layer. Outscraper gives you raw data and flexibility.
Case B: choose outsend. You are a solo operator, freelancer, or work at a French SMB. You want to start from an area and a business type, and get a qualified, contact-ready list (verified emails, phone numbers, SIRET, dead sites removed) without touching an API or stacking four subscriptions. You want a built-in French-market pipeline in one place. That is OutSend's core, and it is free in alpha.
Case C: both make sense. A tech team can use Outscraper for large-scale multi-source extraction on the international side, and OutSend for the French market when integrated qualification (deliverability, French legal data, dead-check) needs to move fast without any development work. The two tools do not overlap.
The one-week test protocol
The best way to decide is to test both tools on the same target for five working days, with a single test dataset. For example, pick a specific trade in a given French department, and compare what you actually get, not what is promised.
Day 1: the same extraction on both sides. On Outscraper, create your key, run the Maps scraper on your area, retrieve the raw output. On OutSend, start from the area and the business type, launch the scrape. Note the time it takes to get going on each side: that shows the gap between setting up an API and using a ready-made interface.
Days 2-3: qualification. On OutSend, immediately chain email lookup, deliverability testing, phone numbers, and dead-check. On Outscraper, activate email enrichment and add up the cost of the stacked services according to the pricing grid. Compare the number of manual steps and third-party tools needed to reach the same result.
Days 4-5: French legal data and the verdict. Check which tool gives you SIRET, SIREN, VAT number, and legal form without rebuilding from third-party sources. Then look at your final database: how many records are genuinely usable by your sales rep today? The best tool is the one that leaves you the fewest rows to rework for your use case.
Comparison table: OutSend vs Outscraper
Objective criteria only: data source, functional scope, dependencies, access model, coverage, language. No judgment on "value for money," which depends too heavily on your specific use case.
| Criterion | Outscraper | OutSend |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Google Maps + 50+ sources (reviews, e-commerce, Google services) | Google Maps on demand by area + business type |
| Functional scope | Data extraction + optional enrichments billed separately | Integrated chain: scrape → email → deliverability → phone numbers → socials → dead-check → legal data → pipeline |
| Dependencies | API integration required (key, webhooks) or no-code dashboard | No API key; everything in the interface |
| Access model | Pay-as-you-go, non-expiring credits, no subscription | Free alpha |
| Geographic coverage | Global, multi-source | France-focused (built-in) |
| Interface / support language | English (multilingual interface) | French |
| French legal enrichment | Not built-in (must be rebuilt) | SIRET/SIREN/VAT/RCS, legal form, directors (built-in) |
| Export | CSV, XLSX, JSON, Parquet | CSV, JSON, XLSX |
If you are still undecided, also check the outsend vs Scrap.io comparison, another Maps scraping service, but with a different positioning from Outscraper. And to go further on the reviews side, OutSend lets you scrape Google Maps reviews including the owner's reply.
FAQ: OutSend vs Outscraper
How much does Google Maps scraping cost on Outscraper?
According to the official pricing page, it is free up to 500 listings, then $3 per 1,000 results from 501 to 100,000, and $1 per 1,000 beyond 100,000. No monthly subscription is imposed: you work on a pay-as-you-go basis, with credits that never expire or post-paid billing. Note: email enrichment is billed separately, at $3 per 1,000 domains after the first 500.
Does OutSend replace Outscraper?
Not exactly. Outscraper is a global multi-source API for tech teams. OutSend is a built-in integrated prospecting pipeline for European B2B, with no API key, that runs from scraping through to full qualification. They serve different needs and can coexist.
Do you need to know how to code to use Outscraper?
Not necessarily: Outscraper offers a no-code dashboard for simple tasks. But to get the most out of it (automation, webhooks, CRM integration), you need the API, which requires generating a key and making programmatic calls, so a technical profile is assumed.
Does OutSend handle French legal data?
Yes, natively. OutSend enriches records with SIRET, SIREN, VAT number, RCS registration, legal form, and company directors, because the product is designed for the French market. On Outscraper, this layer is not built-in and must be reconstructed from third-party sources.
What is the real difference between Outscraper and OutSend?
In one sentence: Outscraper extracts data, OutSend delivers a contact-ready database. Outscraper stops at raw data (which you then qualify yourself, usually via API). OutSend chains in a single pass the scraping, email lookup, deliverability verification, phone numbers, URL dead-checking, and French legal enrichment, without writing a line of code.
Need an overview? Read all the prospecting tool alternative comparisons.